Stronger gun control laws will make it more difficult for citizens to protect themselves and their families. The concept of democratic participation in maintaining the social order, with the accompanying need for protection of individual rights and freedoms, is critical to preventing violence in a society like ours.
Different data sets, different methodologies, extrapolations from limited samples. When the Supreme Court has ruled, it has been more likely to allow regulation than to prohibit it, at least at the state level.
A classroom debate on gun control as part of a violence-reduction curriculum offers an appealing option, but also presents a situation to be avoided. Criminals use guns because handguns are so readily available.
Opponents of regulation argue that laws are not the primary arbiter of behavior. On the other hand, while we think of the Old West as a place of unfettered freedom, frontier communities often exercised their own controls, as demonstrated by such familiar images as cowboys checking their guns at the entrance to the dance hall.
Imposing mandatory, long prison sentences on criminals will reduce crime more effectively than gun control. With such wildly divergent sets of statistical ammunition, one wonders if it even makes sense to prepare for this debate by arming oneself with facts and figures.
Arguments against Handgun Control American citizens have a legal right to own handguns under the Second Amendment, which says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Agreeing on a desirable end is the first step in making good public policy.
One could argue that understanding how to maintain a just and peaceful social order is the primary goal of the social studies curriculum. Countries with strict gun control have much lower murder rates.
But Americans themselves might not be so divided at least, on a few things after all. Both sides use comparative data from other countries to bolster their arguments. Another area of dispute involves the use of guns in self-defense.
Some provide support for popularly held notions, while others might cause students to examine the motives as well as the content of some policy stances. Would another approach be better, either instead of or in addition? Table 1 Gun Control: Others would argue that the role of law is not primarily to change behavior, but to reflect the behavioral norms that a society professes.
The scope of teaching and learning opportunities offered by the debate is suggested in Table 1. What is its goal? And it is not a job that can be left simply to politicians, the courts, and the police. As students consider policy alternatives, it can be helpful to examine the truth of these beliefs and to investigate the context that gives rise to these notions about the so-called American gun culture.
Give students as much choice as possible in forming the groups. Christine Watkins is an educational project consultant and writer based in Chicago. Dearborn, SuiteChicago, IL An estimated 4 million new guns are added to these totals annually, and in recent years, over half of the new guns were handguns.
Despite my own bias in favor of regulation, I found myself wondering if such regulation could be effective in a society so full of discord and so lacking in civil discourse.
The "Debate" Reducing the issue of gun control to "pros" and "cons" is probably the least desirable outcome of studying gun control, but it may be a very useful beginning. Crime threatens everyone, and the police are not usually around when a criminal appears. This issue is clearly rich in content, drawing as it does upon history, economics, political science, sociology, law, government, and cultural anthropology among other disciplines.
But they may also cover up important areas of middle ground. Chatham House Publishers, Whatever its causes, its solution can only be found in the center of the dilemma: President Donald Trump, on a foreign trip to Asia when the Texas shooting occurred, said mental health care should be the priority in the wake of the attack.
Making handguns more difficult to obtain will significantly reduce crime and violence. Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, Oct 02, · It's no secret that Washington has long been divided on new gun control laws. But Americans themselves might not be so divided (at least, on a few things) after all.
Few public policy debates have been as dominated by emotion and misinformation as the one on gun control. Perhaps this debate is so highly charged because it involves such fundamental issues. Custom Gun Control Policy essay paper Gun control is a policy designed to limit the production, possession or use of firearms or guns by private citizens (Henderson, 9).
The guns in question are mostly personal firearms that include long guns and handguns. High-profile mass shootings in the United States in recent years have rekindled the gun control debate and U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons. The incident sparked a public campaign known.
Gun Control Policies in the United States Debates about gun control often drift towards general arguments about whether guns make us safer or less safe, and gun control is equated with restricting gun ownership.
However, gun policies could enhance public safety in the United States. 3. Oct 07, · Frequently asked questions about gun policy and public opinion.
Gun Control Explained Log Surveys that ask broadly whether people .Download