Goldhagen and Browning arrived at radically different conclusions. Sources are misrepresented in ways that could only be the result of deliberate misrepresentation, every is twisted to justifying a preconcieved idea rather than any attempt at historical investigation.
Goldhagen presented a monocausal thesis which explained the holocaust as resulting from a uniquely German strand of virulent anti-semitism which dismissed the attempts of other writers to place the holocaust in a much more complex context including consideration of a wide range of factors.
This is the problem. There is not much evidence of "obvious distaste and reluctance" to kill Poles to be seen in this episode. Some of his critics have agreed with him that his thesis is "not intrinsically racist or otherwise illegitimate", including Ruth Bettina Birn and Norman Finkelstein A Nation on Trial.
Indeed, fascist Spain was a haven for Jews during the Holocaust" he said.
He prefers instead to use parts of the statements selectively, to re-interpret them according to his own point of view, or to take them out of context and make them fit into his own interpretative framework. Finally, Mommsen criticizes Goldhagen for errors in his understanding of the internal structure of the Third Reich.
Guttenplan argued that the Nazi theories about "Judo-Bolshevism" made for a more complex explanation for the Holocaust than the Goldhagen thesis about an "elminationist anti-Semitic" culture. Goldhagen argued that it "strains credibility" to imagine that "ordinary Danes or Italians" could have acted as he claimed ordinary Germans did during the Holocaust to prove that "eliminationist" anti-Semitism was uniquely German.
Goldhagen himself mentions that a large proportion of the Jewish upper classes in Germany converted to Christianity in the nineteenth century. His approach would be anthropological, treating Germans the same way that an anthropologist would describe preindustrial people who believed in absurd things such as trees having magical powers.
Millions of Germans who wished to acknowledge the undeniable and well-documented fact that ordinary Germans participated in the Holocaust welcomed his work; his suggestion that Germans were predestined killers was accepted as part of the uncomfortable package.
Only elderly Poles, mostly women, remained in the village, as the younger Poles had all fled. All this is absurd, because the criticism of Goldhagen is backed up so well.
Holocaust Memorial Museum that "The book is advertised as something that will change our thinking. He uses material as an underpinning for his pre-conceived theory. None of these is true. Little is new in the overall description, but the details and the way he analyzes the attitude of the murderers is powerful and convincing".
In a society where eliminationist norms were universal and in which Jews were rejected even after they had converted, or so he argues, the rise of this extreme form of assimilation of Jews would hardly have been possible.
Hilberg, Browning, Kershaw etc etc. There were regional variations in anti-Semitism even within Germany.
This is his revengeA NATION ON TRIAL The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth. By Norman G. Finkelstein and Ruth Bettina Birn. pp. New York: Metropolitan Books/ Henry Holt &. A Nation on Trial has 59 ratings and 3 reviews. robert said: He demolishes Goldhagen's Zionist thesis that the German people in were all anti Semiti /5.
A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth [Norman G. Finkelstein, Ruth Bettina Birn] on polkadottrail.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Attempts to refute the claim that Germans supported the Jews' executions during the Holocaust4/5(16). A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth [Norman G. Finkelstein, Ruth Bettina Birn] on polkadottrail.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
No recent work of history has generated as much interest as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen's Hitler's Willing Executioners.
Purporting to solve the mystery of the Nazi holocaust4/5(16). Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Nation on Trial: the Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth at polkadottrail.com Read.
Hitler's Willing Executioners: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth.
In response to their book, Goldhagen sought a retraction and apology from Birn, threatening at one point to sue her for libel and according to Salon declaring Finkelstein "a supporter of Hamas".Download